This article describes organizational symbolism from a sociology of knowledge perspective and considers both the theoretical and extra-theoretical bases of the symbolic approach. It illustrates the distinctive principles of the symbolic approach with respect to other methods used in the study of organizations, the concepts on which it is based, and the organizational issues on which it has shed significant light. Symbolist studies of organizations have refocused scholarly attention on the multidisciplinary understanding of the logos, ethos, and pathos of organizational life. They have done so by stressing the production of knowledge tout court, rather than concerning themselves with the applicability of the organizational knowledge acquired by this approach for managerial purposes. Organizational symbolism is described in the article as a fluctuating and emerging social construction whose growth and spread has been fostered by support within academia. Keywords,,,, ABELSON, R.
Corso Di Sociologia Il Mulino Pdf Merge. Quando la sociologia di fa etica. The editor points out in this report the. Dal 2004 cura il corso di.
Beliefs are like possessions. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 1986, 16(3), 223- 250., ABRAVANEL, H. Mediatory myth in the service of organizational ideology. R., Frost, P. J., Morgan, G., and Dandridge, T. (Eds.), Organizational symbolism. Green-wich, CT: JAI Press, 1983.
Gendering organizational theory. In Mills, A., and Tancred, P.
(eds.), Gendering organizational analysis. London: Sage, 1992. La science des symboles. Paris: Payot, 1976. ALVESSON, M., & BERG, P.
Corporate culture and organizational symbolism. Berlin: de Gruyter, 1992., ALVESSON, M., & WILLMOTI H. On the idea of emancipation in management and or-ganization studies. Academy of Management Review, 1992, 17(3), 432- 464. Per una sociologia oltre il post-moderno. Bari: Laterza, 1988.
Paris: Editions du Seuil, 1957 (English translation: Mythologies. London: Granada, 1973).
Paris: Seuil, 1970 (Italian translation: S/Z. Torino: Einaudi, 1973).
Outsiders: Studies in the sociology of deviance. New York: Free Press, 1963. Emotional structures in organizations. Lund: Studentlitteratur, 1979. BERGER, P., & LUCKMANN, T. The social construction of reality.
Garden City, NY: Dou-bleday and Co., 1966. Symbolic interactionism. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1969. Race, language and culture. New York: MacMillan, 1948. BOLOGNINI, B. I1 mito come espressione dei valori organizzativi e come fattore strutturale.
In Gagliardi, P. (ed.), Le imprese come culture. Torino: Isedi, 1986.
BROMS, H., & GAHMBERG, H. Mythology in management culture. Helsinki: Helsinki School of Economics Publications D-58, 1982. BROMS, H., & GAHMBERG, H.
Communication to self in organizations and cultures. Ad-ministrative Science Quarterly, 1983, 28, 482- 495., BRYMAN, A. Research methods and organization studies. Boston: Unwin Hyman, 1989., CALAS, M. & SMIRCICH, L. Re-writing gender into organizational theorizing.
In Reed, M., and Hughes, M. (eds.), Rethinking organization.
London: Sage, 1992. Philosophie der Symbolischen Formen (Vols. Cassirer, 1923-1929. Theoretical sociology.
Orlando: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, 1988 (Italian trans-lation: Teorie sociologiche. Bologna: Ii Mulino, 1992). Le vie delta sociologia. Bologna: I1 Mulino, 1985. Manuale di sociologia delta culture.
Bari: Laterza, 1996. CZARNIAWSKA-JOERGES, B. & JOERGES, B. Linguistic artifacts at service of organiza-tional control. In Gagliardi, P. (ed.), Symbols and artifacts. Berlin: de Gruyter, 1990., DEAN, J.
W., RAMIREZ, R., & OTTENSMEYER, E. An aesthetic perspective on organi-zations.
In Cooper, C., and Jackson, S. (eds.), Creating tomorrow's organizations. Chich-ester: Wiley, 1997. Symbolic interactionism and cultural studies. Oxford: Blackwell, 1992. L'estetica del mito. Da Vico a Wittgenstein.
Milano: Mursia, 1967. Implicit meanings. Boston: Routledge, 1975. Limagination symbolique. Paris: Puf, 1964. Les formes 'limentaires de la vie religieuse. Paris: Alcan, 1912.
Opera aperta. Forma e indeterminazione nelle poetiche contemporanee.
Milano: Bom-piani, 1962. FELDMAN, M., & MARCH, J. Information in organization as signal and symbol. Adminis-trative Science Quarterly, 1981, 26 171- 186., FERRANTE, M., & ZAN, S. II fenomeno organizzativo.
La Nuova Italia Scientifica, 1994. Emotion and organizing.
R., Hardy, C., and Nord, W. (eds.), Handbook of organization studies. London: Sage, 1996. Emotion and management learning. Management Learning, 1997, 28(1), 13- 25., FRANZINI, E., & MAZZOCUT-MIS, M. Milano: Mondadori, 1996.
An embarrassment of proper times: A foreword. In Nowotny, H. The modern and postmodern experience. Cambridge: Polity Press, 1994. GADAMER, H.-G. Die aktualitat des schonen. Stuttgart: Reclam, 1977.
GAGLIARDI, P. Exploring the aesthetic side of organizational life. R., Hardy, C., and Nord, W. (eds.), Handbook of organization studies. London: Sage, 1996. GARFINKEL, H.
Studies in ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1967. The interpretation of cultures. New York: Basic Books, 1973. Gender, symbolism and organizational cultures. London: Sage, 1995.
GHERARDI, S., & STRATI, A. The temporal dimension in organizational studies. Organi-zation Studies, 1988, 9(2), 149- 164., GOETZE, D. Kultur und subkultur.
Kolner Zeitschnift fur Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie, 1972, 24 583- 597. Interaction ritual. New York: Doubleday, 1967. Management rituals: maintaining simplicity in the chain of command. In Lin-stead, S., Grafton Small, R., and Jeffcut, P. (eds.) Understanding management.
London: Sage, 1996. Emotional intelligence. London: Bloomsbury, 1996.
J., BUTLER, R. J., CRAY, D., MALLORY, G.
R., & WILSON, D. Top decisions: Strategic decision-making in organizations. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1986. HOPFL, H., & LINSTEAD, S. Learning to feel and feeling to learn: Emotion and learning in organizations.
Management Learning, 1997, 28(1), 5- 12., HUSSERL, E. Ideen zu einer reinen phanomenologie und phanomenologischen philosophie. Memeyer, 1913. Critique and theory building. Academy of Management Review, 1992, 17(3), 582- 606., JOAS, H.
Die kreativitat des handelns. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp Verlag, 1992 (English translation: The creativity of action. Cambrige: Polity Press, 1996). Studying organizational symbolism. Thousands Oaks: Sage, 1996., KNORR CETINA, K. Primitive classification and postmodernity: Towards a sociological no-tion of fiction. Theory, Culture & Society, 1994, 11 1- 22., KROEBER, A.
L., & KLUCKHOHN, C. Culture: A critical review of concepts and definitions. New York: Vintage, 1963 (1952).
Two models of communication. In Lotman, J. (ed.), Soviet semiotics. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1977. Oeuvres compltes.
Paris: P16iade, 1945. In Mannheim, K., Essays on the sociology of culture.
London: Routledge & Kegan Paul. In Vierkandt, A. (ed.), Handwortenbuch der soziologie. Stuttgart: Enke, 1931.
Essays on the sociology of culture. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1956. Decisions and organizations.
Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1988. Gossip, information, and decision-making.
In Sproull, L. S., and Larkey, P. (eds.), Advances in information processing in organizations. Greenwich: JAI Press, 1984. The organizational culture war games: A struggle for intellectual dominance. R., Hardy, C., & Nord, W. (eds.), Handbook of organization studies.
London: Sage, 1996. MARTIN, J., FELDMAN, M., HATCH, M. J., & SITKIN, S. The uniqueness paradox in organizational stories. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1983, 28, 438- 453., MEAD, G.
Mind, self and society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1934. MUMBY, D., & PUTNAM, L. The politics of emotion. Academy of Management Review, 1992, 17(3), 465- 486.
Le taylorisme dans l'industrie am6ricaine. In de Montmollin, M., and Pastre, O. (eds.), Le taylorisme. Paris: Editions La Decouverte, 1984. Eigenzeit entstehung und strukturierung eines zeitgefuhls. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp Verlag, 1989 (English translation: Time.
The modem and postmodem experience. Cambridge: Polity Press, 1994). Conceptual framework for the design of organizational control mechanisms. Management Science, 1979, 25(9), 833- 848., POLANYI, M. Personal knowledge. Towards a post-critical philosophy. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1958.
The tacit dimension. Garden City: Doubleday, 1966.
(ed.), Knowing and being. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1969. PUTNAM, L., & MUMBY, D.
Organizations, emotions and the myth of rationality. In Fine-man, S. (ed.), Emotion in organizations. London: Sage, 1993. The sociology of organizations. Themes, perspectives and prospects. New York: Har-vester Wheatsheaf, 1992.
Die wissensformen und die gesellschaft. Leipzig: Neue Geist, 1926. Collected papers (Vol. Den Haag: Nijhoff, 1962. Collected papers (Vol. Den Haag: Nijhoff, 1964., SCHWARTZ, H., & JACOBS, J.
Qualitative sociology. A method to the madness. New York: Free Press, 1979.
SCHWARTZMAN, H. Ethnography in organizations. Newbury Park: Sage, 1993., SELZNICK, P.
Leadership in administration. New York: Harper and Row, 1957. Organizational imitation in identity transformation. In Czarniawska, B., and Seven, B. (eds.), Translating organizational change.
Berlin: de Gruyter, 1996., SILVERMAN, D. Interpreting qualitative data. London: Sage, 1993.
Fantasies and the location of skill. In Strati, A.
(ed.), The symbolics of skill. Trento: University of Trento, Dipartimento di Politica Sociale, 1985. SIMS, D., FINEMAN, S., & GABRIEL, Y. Organizing and organizations. London: Sage, 1993. Il pensiero e il simbolo. In Zecchi, S.
(ed.), Forme del simbolo. Bologna: 11 Mulino, 1992. SISMON DO, S. Some social constructions. Social Studies of Science, 1993, 23(3), 515- 553., SMIRCICH, L. Concepts of culture and organizational analysis. Administrative Science Quar-terly, 1983, 28(3), 339- 358., SPERBER, D.
Le symbolisme en general. Paris: Hermann, 1974 (English translation: Rethinking symbolism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1975). SUSMAN, G., & EVERED, R. An assessment of the scientific merits of action research. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1978, 23 582- 603., STRATI, A.
The symbolics of skill. Trento: University of Trento, Dipartimento di Politica Sociale, 1985.
Organization culture. (ed.), Concise encyclopaedia of participation and co-management. Berlin: de Gruyter, 1992.(a), STRATI, A.
Aesthetic understanding of organizational life. Academy of Management Review, 1992, 17(3), 568- 581. (b) STRATI, A. Organizations viewed through the lens of aesthetics. Organization, 1996, 3(2), 209- 218., STRATI, A. Organization as hypertext: A metaphor from visual cultures.
Studies in Cultures, Organizations and Societies, 1997, 3(2), 307- 324., TRICE, H. Rites and ceremonials in organizational cultures. Research in the Sociology of Or-ganizations (Vol. 4), JAI Press, 1985, 4, pp. In Turner, B. (ed.), Organizational symbolism. Berlin: de Gruyter, 1990.
(a), TURNER, B. Organizational symbolism. Berlin: de Gruyter, 1990. (b), TURNER, V. Schism and continuity in an African society: A study of Ndembu village life.
Man-chester: Manchester University Press, 1957. Dramas, fields and metaphors: Symbolic action in human society. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1974.
Social dramas and stories about them. Critical Inquiry, 1980, 7, 141- 168., TYLOR, E. Primitive culture. London: John Murray, 1871. Qualitative methodology.
Newbury Park: Sage, 1983 (1979). VATTIMO, G., & ROVATTI, P. II pensiero debole. Milano: Feltrinelli, 1983. Principi di una scienza nuova. Napoli: Mosca, 1725 (2nd Ed., 1744; reprinted, Mi-lano: Rizzoli, 1977). Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft.
Tubingen: Mohr, 1922. The social psychology of organizing. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley, 1969. Theory construction as disciplined imagination. Academy of Management Review, 1989, 14(4), 516- 531.
Med I Zaoka Jelena Tomasevic Mp3 Download. Street corner society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1943. Organizational stories as symbols which control the organization. R., Frost, P. J., Morgan, G., and Dandridge, T. (eds.), Organizational symbolism.
Green-wich, CT: JAI Press, 1983. Running a commentary on imaginatively re-lived events. In Strati, A. (ed.), The symbolics of skill. Trento: University of Trento, Dipartimento di Poli-tica Sociale, 1985.